Azerbaijan vs Libya: Forest fires — Emissions
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- Azerbaijan
- Libya
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 106th and Libya ranks 106th of 214 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0931 kt | 0 kt | 0.0931 kt | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 0.075 kt | 0 kt | 0.075 kt | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 0.0289 kt | 0 kt | 0.0289 kt | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 0.0722 kt | 0 kt | 0.0722 kt | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, Azerbaijan or Libya?
- Azerbaijan, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between Azerbaijan and Libya?
- 0 kt, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Libya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Libya rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- Azerbaijan ranks 106th and Libya ranks 106th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf