Belgium vs Polynesia: Forest fires — Emissions
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- Belgium
- Polynesia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Polynesia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Polynesia ahead.
Belgium ranks 119th and Polynesia ranks 119th of 236 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Polynesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.002 kt | 0.0013 kt | 0.0007 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 0.0013 kt | 0.0125 kt | 0.0113 kt | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, Belgium or Polynesia?
- Belgium, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between Belgium and Polynesia?
- 0 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Polynesia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Polynesia rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- Belgium ranks 119th and Polynesia ranks 119th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf