Bermuda vs Mongolia: Forest fires — Emissions
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- Bermuda
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.002 kt against 0 kt in Bermuda, a difference of 0.002 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Bermuda ranks 119th and Mongolia ranks 118th of 236 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 9.23 kt | 9.23 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 2.06 kt | 2.06 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.2412 kt | 0.2412 kt | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.002 kt | 0.002 kt | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, Bermuda or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 0.002 kt against 0 kt in Bermuda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between Bermuda and Mongolia?
- 0.002 kt, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Mongolia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Bermuda and Mongolia rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- Bermuda ranks 119th and Mongolia ranks 118th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf