Cuba vs Greece: Forest fires — Emissions
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- Cuba
- Greece
How they compare
Greece currently reports 2.95 kt against 2.69 kt in Cuba, a difference of 0.26 kt.
That makes Greece's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 36th and Greece ranks 34th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Greece in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Greece | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.72 kt | 1.18 kt | 0.5409 kt | Cuba |
| 2000s | 1.26 kt | 0.5174 kt | 0.7442 kt | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.7577 kt | 0.1445 kt | 0.6132 kt | Cuba |
| 2020s | 1.61 kt | 1.79 kt | 0.1712 kt | Greece |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, Cuba or Greece?
- Greece, at 2.95 kt against 2.69 kt in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between Cuba and Greece?
- 0.26 kt, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Greece?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Greece rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- Cuba ranks 36th and Greece ranks 34th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf