Czechia vs Norway: Forest fires — Emissions
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- Czechia
- Norway
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Norway, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Norway ahead.
Czechia ranks 106th and Norway ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0099 kt | 0.0533 kt | 0.0433 kt | Norway |
| 2000s | 0.006 kt | 0.0117 kt | 0.0057 kt | Norway |
| 2010s | 0.017 kt | 0.0031 kt | 0.0139 kt | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.0212 kt | 0 kt | 0.0212 kt | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, Czechia or Norway?
- Czechia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Norway as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between Czechia and Norway?
- 0 kt, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Norway?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Norway rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- Czechia ranks 106th and Norway ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf