Iraq vs Slovakia: Forest fires — Emissions
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- Iraq
- Slovakia
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Slovakia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 106th and Slovakia ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 2 and Slovakia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2198 kt | 0.0076 kt | 0.2122 kt | Iraq |
| 2000s | 0.0656 kt | 0.0054 kt | 0.0602 kt | Iraq |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0045 kt | 0.0045 kt | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0006 kt | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, Iraq or Slovakia?
- Iraq, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between Iraq and Slovakia?
- 0 kt, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Iraq and Slovakia rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- Iraq ranks 106th and Slovakia ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf