Ireland vs Samoa: Forest fires — Emissions
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- Ireland
- Samoa
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Samoa, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Samoa ahead.
Ireland ranks 106th and Samoa ranks 106th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 2 and Samoa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0183 kt | 0.0429 kt | 0.0246 kt | Samoa |
| 2000s | 0.0072 kt | 0.0013 kt | 0.0059 kt | Ireland |
| 2010s | 0.005 kt | 0.0125 kt | 0.0075 kt | Samoa |
| 2020s | 0.0044 kt | 0 kt | 0.0044 kt | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, Ireland or Samoa?
- Ireland, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between Ireland and Samoa?
- 0 kt, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Samoa?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Ireland and Samoa rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- Ireland ranks 106th and Samoa ranks 106th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf