Jamaica vs Sweden: Forest fires — Emissions
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- Jamaica
- Sweden
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
Jamaica ranks 106th and Sweden ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0326 kt | 0.0626 kt | 0.03 kt | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0.0261 kt | 0.0068 kt | 0.0193 kt | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 0.0116 kt | 0.1051 kt | 0.0935 kt | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, Jamaica or Sweden?
- Jamaica, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between Jamaica and Sweden?
- 0 kt, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Sweden?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Sweden rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- Jamaica ranks 106th and Sweden ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf