Libya vs Niger: Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1
Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Libya
- Niger
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Niger, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 119th and Niger ranks 119th of 236 countries.
Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 4.16 kt | 4.16 kt | Niger |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.4183 kt | 0.4183 kt | Niger |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1, Libya or Niger?
- Libya, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Niger as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 between Libya and Niger?
- 0 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Niger?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Niger rank globally for forest fires — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1?
- Libya ranks 119th and Niger ranks 119th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf