Mongolia vs Niger: Forest fires — Emissions
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- Mongolia
- Niger
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.002 kt against 0 kt in Niger, a difference of 0.002 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Niger ahead.
Mongolia ranks 118th and Niger ranks 119th of 236 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.23 kt | 4.16 kt | 5.07 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 2.06 kt | 0.4183 kt | 1.64 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.2412 kt | 0 kt | 0.2412 kt | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.002 kt | 0 kt | 0.002 kt | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, Mongolia or Niger?
- Mongolia, at 0.002 kt against 0 kt in Niger as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between Mongolia and Niger?
- 0.002 kt, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Niger?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and Niger rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- Mongolia ranks 118th and Niger ranks 119th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf