Polynesia vs Sweden: Forest fires — Emissions
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- Polynesia
- Sweden
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
Polynesia ranks 119th and Sweden ranks 119th of 236 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Polynesia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0435 kt | 0.0626 kt | 0.0191 kt | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0.0013 kt | 0.0068 kt | 0.0055 kt | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.0125 kt | 0.1051 kt | 0.0926 kt | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, Polynesia or Sweden?
- Polynesia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between Polynesia and Sweden?
- 0 kt, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Sweden?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Polynesia and Sweden rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- Polynesia ranks 119th and Sweden ranks 119th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf