Samoa vs Uzbekistan: Forest fires — Emissions
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- Samoa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Samoa ranks 106th and Uzbekistan ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0495 kt | 0.8766 kt | 0.8271 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0.0013 kt | 0.1445 kt | 0.1432 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0.0125 kt | 0 kt | 0.0125 kt | Samoa |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, Samoa or Uzbekistan?
- Samoa, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between Samoa and Uzbekistan?
- 0 kt, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Samoa and Uzbekistan rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- Samoa ranks 106th and Uzbekistan ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf