China, Hong Kong SAR vs Namibia: Forest fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2015
Namibia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
109th
Namibia rank
109th

Forest fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Namibia
-2000200400600199120072024

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Namibia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Namibia ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 109th and Namibia ranks 109th of 171 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 25 % change on previous year -3.99 % change on previous year 28.99 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s -83.33 % change on previous year -31.88 % change on previous year 51.45 % change on previous year Namibia
2010s -64.29 % change on previous year 25 % change on previous year 89.29 % change on previous year Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, China, Hong Kong SAR or Namibia?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Namibia as of 2015.
What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between China, Hong Kong SAR and Namibia?
0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Namibia?
12 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2014.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Namibia rank globally for forest fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 109th and Namibia ranks 109th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Namibia: Forest fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-fires-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-fires-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/namibia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Namibia: Forest fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 5,398 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Forest fires — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.