Denmark vs Latvia: Forest fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Denmark
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Latvia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Denmark rank
109th
Latvia rank
109th
Forest fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Denmark
- Latvia
How they compare
Denmark currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Latvia ahead.
Denmark ranks 109th and Latvia ranks 109th of 171 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 % change on previous year | 22.12 % change on previous year | 22.12 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 2000s | -50 % change on previous year | 172.22 % change on previous year | 222.22 % change on previous year | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Denmark or Latvia?
- Denmark, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2001.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Denmark and Latvia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2001.
- How do Denmark and Latvia rank globally for forest fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
- Denmark ranks 109th and Latvia ranks 109th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Forest fires — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.