Belize vs Malta: Forestland — Emissions
Forestland — Emissions over time
- Belize
- Malta
How they compare
Belize currently reports -0.2921 kt against -0.3438 kt in Malta, a difference of 0.0517 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 92nd and Malta ranks 93rd of 234 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 3 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.99 kt | 0 kt | 1.99 kt | Belize |
| 2000s | -508.87 kt | 0 kt | 508.87 kt | Malta |
| 2010s | 425.6 kt | -1.51 kt | 427.11 kt | Belize |
| 2020s | 0.001 kt | -1.2 kt | 1.2 kt | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — emissions, Belize or Malta?
- Belize, at -0.2921 kt against -0.3438 kt in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forestland — emissions between Belize and Malta?
- 0.0517 kt, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Malta?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Malta rank globally for forestland — emissions?
- Belize ranks 92nd and Malta ranks 93rd of 234 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf