Aruba vs Belgium: Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Aruba
0.2794 kt
in 2025
Belgium
0 kt
in 2025
Aruba rank
38th
Belgium rank
41st
Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) over time
- Aruba
- Belgium
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.2794 kt against 0 kt in Belgium, a difference of 0.2794 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 38th and Belgium ranks 41st of 243 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Belgium in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.4185 kt | -3,421 kt | 3,421 kt | Aruba |
| 2010s | 0.244 kt | -2,141 kt | 2,141 kt | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0.2064 kt | 255.76 kt | 255.55 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — net emissions/removals (co2), Aruba or Belgium?
- Aruba, at 0.2794 kt against 0 kt in Belgium as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — net emissions/removals (co2) between Aruba and Belgium?
- 0.2794 kt, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Belgium?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Belgium rank globally for forestland — net emissions/removals (co2)?
- Aruba ranks 38th and Belgium ranks 41st of 243 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).