Bulgaria vs Serbia: Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2)
Bulgaria
-19,766 kt
in 2025
Serbia
-25,263 kt
in 2025
Bulgaria rank
203rd
Serbia rank
206th
Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) over time
- Bulgaria
- Serbia
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports -19,766 kt against -25,263 kt in Serbia, a difference of 5,497 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 203rd and Serbia ranks 206th of 223 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -28,216 kt | -24,765 kt | 3,451 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | -18,628 kt | -24,551 kt | 5,923 kt | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | -20,286 kt | -24,969 kt | 4,683 kt | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — net emissions/removals (co2), Bulgaria or Serbia?
- Bulgaria, at -19,766 kt against -25,263 kt in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — net emissions/removals (co2) between Bulgaria and Serbia?
- 5,497 kt, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Serbia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Bulgaria and Serbia rank globally for forestland — net emissions/removals (co2)?
- Bulgaria ranks 203rd and Serbia ranks 206th of 223 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).