Greece vs Luxembourg: Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Greece
0 kt
in 2025
Luxembourg
0 kt
in 2025
Greece rank
41st
Luxembourg rank
41st
Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) over time
- Greece
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Greece currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Greece ahead.
Greece ranks 41st and Luxembourg ranks 41st of 243 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -79.2 kt | -524.2 kt | 445 kt | Greece |
| 2010s | -6,624 kt | -284.53 kt | 6,340 kt | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | -1,612 kt | -46.44 kt | 1,566 kt | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestland — net emissions/removals (co2), Greece or Luxembourg?
- Greece, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Luxembourg as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forestland — net emissions/removals (co2) between Greece and Luxembourg?
- 0 kt, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Luxembourg?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Greece and Luxembourg rank globally for forestland — net emissions/removals (co2)?
- Greece ranks 41st and Luxembourg ranks 41st of 243 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestland — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).