Brazil vs Malawi: Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use … annual
Brazil
2.07 % change on previous year
in 2024
Malawi
2.08 % change on previous year
in 2024
Brazil rank
113th
Malawi rank
111th
Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use … annual over time
- Brazil
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 2.08 % change on previous year against 2.07 % change on previous year in Brazil, a difference of 0.01 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 173 shared years of data; in 1852 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 113th and Malawi ranks 111th of 214 countries.
Across the 18 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 9 and Malawi in 9.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 34.73 % change on previous year | 34.29 % change on previous year | 0.4451 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1860s | 8.51 % change on previous year | 9.78 % change on previous year | 1.27 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 1870s | 5.03 % change on previous year | 6.5 % change on previous year | 1.47 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 1880s | 4.05 % change on previous year | 4.5 % change on previous year | 0.4518 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 1890s | 3.96 % change on previous year | 3.36 % change on previous year | 0.6036 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1900s | 3.81 % change on previous year | 3.75 % change on previous year | 0.0543 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1910s | 3.92 % change on previous year | 4.42 % change on previous year | 0.4973 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 1920s | 3.8 % change on previous year | 4.23 % change on previous year | 0.4268 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 1930s | 3.04 % change on previous year | 3.95 % change on previous year | 0.9139 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 1940s | 2.6 % change on previous year | 3.41 % change on previous year | 0.8172 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 1950s | 3.9 % change on previous year | 3.1 % change on previous year | 0.8013 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1960s | 4.38 % change on previous year | 1.8 % change on previous year | 2.58 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1970s | 5.01 % change on previous year | 1.62 % change on previous year | 3.39 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1980s | 4.7 % change on previous year | 2.22 % change on previous year | 2.49 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1990s | 3.74 % change on previous year | 5.17 % change on previous year | 1.42 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 2000s | 3.07 % change on previous year | 3.85 % change on previous year | 0.7798 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 2010s | 2.75 % change on previous year | 2.17 % change on previous year | 0.574 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 2020s | 2.22 % change on previous year | 2.15 % change on previous year | 0.0687 % change on previous year | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, annual, Brazil or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 2.08 % change on previous year against 2.07 % change on previous year in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, annual between Brazil and Malawi?
- 0.01 % change on previous year, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Malawi?
- 173 years are reported by both, from 1852 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Malawi rank globally for global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, annual?
- Brazil ranks 113th and Malawi ranks 111th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.