Congo vs Serbia: Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use … annual
Congo
1.31 % change on previous year
in 2024
Serbia
1.29 % change on previous year
in 2024
Congo rank
159th
Serbia rank
161st
Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use … annual over time
- Congo
- Serbia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 1.31 % change on previous year against 1.29 % change on previous year in Serbia, a difference of 0.02 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 173 shared years of data; in 1852 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 159th and Serbia ranks 161st of 214 countries.
Across the 18 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 11 and Serbia in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 36.86 % change on previous year | 34.53 % change on previous year | 2.33 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 1860s | 9.88 % change on previous year | 8.44 % change on previous year | 1.44 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 1870s | 5.82 % change on previous year | 5.23 % change on previous year | 0.597 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 1880s | 3.95 % change on previous year | 3.88 % change on previous year | 0.0722 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 1890s | 3 % change on previous year | 4.72 % change on previous year | 1.72 % change on previous year | Serbia |
| 1900s | 4.33 % change on previous year | 5.43 % change on previous year | 1.1 % change on previous year | Serbia |
| 1910s | 6.03 % change on previous year | 3.26 % change on previous year | 2.77 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 1920s | 5.33 % change on previous year | 10.04 % change on previous year | 4.71 % change on previous year | Serbia |
| 1930s | 3.83 % change on previous year | 6.23 % change on previous year | 2.41 % change on previous year | Serbia |
| 1940s | 2.15 % change on previous year | 3.71 % change on previous year | 1.56 % change on previous year | Serbia |
| 1950s | 1.94 % change on previous year | 5.93 % change on previous year | 4 % change on previous year | Serbia |
| 1960s | 1.57 % change on previous year | 6.31 % change on previous year | 4.74 % change on previous year | Serbia |
| 1970s | 10.78 % change on previous year | 7.87 % change on previous year | 2.92 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 1980s | 12.12 % change on previous year | 5.61 % change on previous year | 6.5 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 1990s | 7.92 % change on previous year | 2.53 % change on previous year | 5.39 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 2000s | 4.42 % change on previous year | 1.87 % change on previous year | 2.55 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 2010s | 2.24 % change on previous year | 1.45 % change on previous year | 0.7938 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 2020s | 1.42 % change on previous year | 1.36 % change on previous year | 0.0557 % change on previous year | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, annual, Congo or Serbia?
- Congo, at 1.31 % change on previous year against 1.29 % change on previous year in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, annual between Congo and Serbia?
- 0.02 % change on previous year, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Serbia?
- 173 years are reported by both, from 1852 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Serbia rank globally for global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, annual?
- Congo ranks 159th and Serbia ranks 161st of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.