Greenland vs Kazakhstan: Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use … annual

Greenland
1.79 % change on previous year
in 2024
Kazakhstan
1.81 % change on previous year
in 2024
Greenland rank
131st
Kazakhstan rank
128th

Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use … annual over time

  • Greenland
  • Kazakhstan
0255075100185219382024

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 1.81 % change on previous year against 1.79 % change on previous year in Greenland, a difference of 0.02 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Greenland ahead.

Greenland ranks 131st and Kazakhstan ranks 128th of 214 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 6 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greenland Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1950s 37.25 % change on previous year 6.04 % change on previous year 31.21 % change on previous year Greenland
1960s 12.86 % change on previous year 5.48 % change on previous year 7.38 % change on previous year Greenland
1970s 7.09 % change on previous year 4.25 % change on previous year 2.84 % change on previous year Greenland
1980s 3.9 % change on previous year 2.96 % change on previous year 0.9335 % change on previous year Greenland
1990s 3.41 % change on previous year 1.35 % change on previous year 2.06 % change on previous year Greenland
2000s 2.72 % change on previous year 1.16 % change on previous year 1.56 % change on previous year Greenland
2010s 1.93 % change on previous year 2.03 % change on previous year 0.0956 % change on previous year Kazakhstan
2020s 1.74 % change on previous year 1.86 % change on previous year 0.1148 % change on previous year Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, annual, Greenland or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 1.81 % change on previous year against 1.79 % change on previous year in Greenland as of 2024.
What is the difference in global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, annual between Greenland and Kazakhstan?
0.02 % change on previous year, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Kazakhstan?
74 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2024.
How do Greenland and Kazakhstan rank globally for global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, annual?
Greenland ranks 131st and Kazakhstan ranks 128th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Kazakhstan: Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/global-warming-contributions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-annual-growth-rate/greenland/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/global-warming-contributions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-annual-growth-rate/greenland/kazakhstan/">Greenland vs Kazakhstan: Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 35,338 data points, 1852–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.