Canada vs Kiribati: Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use … square

Canada
0 °C per square kilometre
in 2024
Kiribati
0 °C per square kilometre
in 2024
Canada rank
141st
Kiribati rank
139th

Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use … square over time

  • Canada
  • Kiribati
000000196119922024

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0 °C per square kilometre against 0 °C per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0 °C per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 141st and Kiribati ranks 139th of 203 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 6 and Kiribati in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Kiribati Difference Ahead
1960s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Canada
1970s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Canada
1980s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Canada
1990s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Canada
2000s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Canada
2010s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Canada
2020s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per, Canada or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 0 °C per square kilometre against 0 °C per square kilometre in Canada as of 2024.
What is the difference in global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per between Canada and Kiribati?
0 °C per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Kiribati?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Canada and Kiribati rank globally for global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per?
Canada ranks 141st and Kiribati ranks 139th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Kiribati: Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/global-warming-contributions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-per-square-kilometre/canada/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/global-warming-contributions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-per-square-kilometre/canada/kiribati/">Canada vs Kiribati: Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per square kilometre
Unit
°C per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 11,814 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.