Ecuador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use … square

Ecuador
0 °C per square kilometre
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
0 °C per square kilometre
in 2024
Ecuador rank
113th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
115th

Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use … square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Sao Tome and Principe
000000196119922024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 °C per square kilometre against 0 °C per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 °C per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Ecuador ranks 113th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 115th of 203 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per, Ecuador or Sao Tome and Principe?
Ecuador, at 0 °C per square kilometre against 0 °C per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per between Ecuador and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 °C per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sao Tome and Principe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per?
Ecuador ranks 113th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 115th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/global-warming-contributions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/global-warming-contributions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/sao-tome-and-principe/">Ecuador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per square kilometre
Unit
°C per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 11,814 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.