Kiribati vs Nepal: Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use … square

Kiribati
0 °C per square kilometre
in 2024
Nepal
0 °C per square kilometre
in 2024
Kiribati rank
139th
Nepal rank
138th

Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use … square over time

  • Kiribati
  • Nepal
000000196119922024

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0 °C per square kilometre against 0 °C per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 0 °C per square kilometre.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 139th and Nepal ranks 138th of 203 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Nepal
1970s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Nepal
1980s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Nepal
2000s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Nepal
2010s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Nepal
2020s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per, Kiribati or Nepal?
Nepal, at 0 °C per square kilometre against 0 °C per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2024.
What is the difference in global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per between Kiribati and Nepal?
0 °C per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Nepal?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Nepal rank globally for global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per?
Kiribati ranks 139th and Nepal ranks 138th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Nepal: Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/global-warming-contributions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/global-warming-contributions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/nepal/">Kiribati vs Nepal: Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per square kilometre
Unit
°C per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 11,814 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.