Mali vs Namibia: Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use … square

Mali
0 °C per square kilometre
in 2024
Namibia
0 °C per square kilometre
in 2024
Mali rank
199th
Namibia rank
201st

Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use … square over time

  • Mali
  • Namibia
000000196119922024

How they compare

Mali currently reports 0 °C per square kilometre against 0 °C per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0 °C per square kilometre.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.

Mali ranks 199th and Namibia ranks 201st of 203 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Mali
1970s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Mali
1980s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Mali
1990s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Mali
2000s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Mali
2010s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Mali
2020s 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre 0 °C per square kilometre Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per, Mali or Namibia?
Mali, at 0 °C per square kilometre against 0 °C per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per between Mali and Namibia?
0 °C per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Namibia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Mali and Namibia rank globally for global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per?
Mali ranks 199th and Namibia ranks 201st of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Namibia: Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/global-warming-contributions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-per-square-kilometre/mali/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/global-warming-contributions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-per-square-kilometre/mali/namibia/">Mali vs Namibia: Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use, per square kilometre
Unit
°C per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 11,814 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Global warming contributions from fossil fuels and land use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.