Cuba vs Hong Kong: Contribution to global mean surface temperature rise from fossil sources

Cuba
0.0011 °C
in 2024
Hong Kong
0.001 °C
in 2024
Cuba rank
76th
Hong Kong rank
78th

Contribution to global mean surface temperature rise from fossil sources over time

  • Cuba
  • Hong Kong
000.0010.0010.001185119372024

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.0011 °C against 0.001 °C in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.0001 °C.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong's.

Across all 174 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 76th and Hong Kong ranks 78th of 214 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 18 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1850s 0 °C 0 °C 0 °C Cuba
1860s 0 °C 0 °C 0 °C Cuba
1870s 0.0001 °C 0 °C 0.0001 °C Cuba
1880s 0.0001 °C 0 °C 0.0001 °C Cuba
1890s 0.0001 °C 0 °C 0.0001 °C Cuba
1900s 0.0001 °C 0 °C 0.0001 °C Cuba
1910s 0.0002 °C 0 °C 0.0002 °C Cuba
1920s 0.0003 °C 0 °C 0.0003 °C Cuba
1930s 0.0004 °C 0 °C 0.0004 °C Cuba
1940s 0.0005 °C 0 °C 0.0005 °C Cuba
1950s 0.0005 °C 0 °C 0.0005 °C Cuba
1960s 0.0004 °C 0.0001 °C 0.0004 °C Cuba
1970s 0.0004 °C 0.0001 °C 0.0003 °C Cuba
1980s 0.0005 °C 0.0002 °C 0.0003 °C Cuba
1990s 0.0007 °C 0.0004 °C 0.0003 °C Cuba
2000s 0.0008 °C 0.0006 °C 0.0002 °C Cuba
2010s 0.001 °C 0.0008 °C 0.0001 °C Cuba
2020s 0.0011 °C 0.001 °C 0.0001 °C Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contribution to global mean surface temperature rise from fossil sources, Cuba or Hong Kong?
Cuba, at 0.0011 °C against 0.001 °C in Hong Kong as of 2024.
What is the difference in contribution to global mean surface temperature rise from fossil sources between Cuba and Hong Kong?
0.0001 °C, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Hong Kong?
174 years are reported by both, from 1851 to 2024.
How do Cuba and Hong Kong rank globally for contribution to global mean surface temperature rise from fossil sources?
Cuba ranks 76th and Hong Kong ranks 78th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Jones et al. (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Contribution to global mean surface temperature rise from fossil sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Hong Kong: Contribution to global mean surface temperature rise from fossil sources. Statizoid, drawing on Jones et al. (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/global-warming-fossil/cuba/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/global-warming-fossil/cuba/hong-kong-sar-china/">Cuba vs Hong Kong: Contribution to global mean surface temperature rise from fossil sources</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contribution to global mean surface temperature rise from fossil sources
Unit
°C
Source
Jones et al. (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
214 places, 37,236 data points, 1851–2024
Last refreshed

Measured in °C.