Ecuador vs Hong Kong: Contribution to global mean surface temperature rise from fossil sources

Ecuador
0.0012 °C
in 2024
Hong Kong
0.001 °C
in 2024
Ecuador rank
75th
Hong Kong rank
78th

Contribution to global mean surface temperature rise from fossil sources over time

  • Ecuador
  • Hong Kong
000.0010.0010.0010.001185119372024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.0012 °C against 0.001 °C in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.0002 °C.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 174 shared years of data; in 1851 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 75th and Hong Kong ranks 78th of 214 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 18 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1850s 0 °C 0 °C 0 °C Ecuador
1860s 0 °C 0 °C 0 °C Ecuador
1870s 0 °C 0 °C 0 °C Ecuador
1880s 0 °C 0 °C 0 °C Ecuador
1890s 0 °C 0 °C 0 °C Ecuador
1900s 0 °C 0 °C 0 °C Ecuador
1910s 0 °C 0 °C 0 °C Ecuador
1920s 0 °C 0 °C 0 °C Ecuador
1930s 0 °C 0 °C 0 °C Ecuador
1940s 0 °C 0 °C 0 °C Ecuador
1950s 0 °C 0 °C 0 °C Ecuador
1960s 0.0001 °C 0.0001 °C 0 °C Ecuador
1970s 0.0001 °C 0.0001 °C 0 °C Ecuador
1980s 0.0003 °C 0.0002 °C 0.0001 °C Ecuador
1990s 0.0005 °C 0.0004 °C 0.0001 °C Ecuador
2000s 0.0007 °C 0.0006 °C 0.0001 °C Ecuador
2010s 0.001 °C 0.0008 °C 0.0001 °C Ecuador
2020s 0.0012 °C 0.001 °C 0.0002 °C Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contribution to global mean surface temperature rise from fossil sources, Ecuador or Hong Kong?
Ecuador, at 0.0012 °C against 0.001 °C in Hong Kong as of 2024.
What is the difference in contribution to global mean surface temperature rise from fossil sources between Ecuador and Hong Kong?
0.0002 °C, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Hong Kong?
174 years are reported by both, from 1851 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Hong Kong rank globally for contribution to global mean surface temperature rise from fossil sources?
Ecuador ranks 75th and Hong Kong ranks 78th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Jones et al. (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Contribution to global mean surface temperature rise from fossil sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Hong Kong: Contribution to global mean surface temperature rise from fossil sources. Statizoid, drawing on Jones et al. (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/global-warming-fossil/ecuador/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/global-warming-fossil/ecuador/hong-kong-sar-china/">Ecuador vs Hong Kong: Contribution to global mean surface temperature rise from fossil sources</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contribution to global mean surface temperature rise from fossil sources
Unit
°C
Source
Jones et al. (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
214 places, 37,236 data points, 1851–2024
Last refreshed

Measured in °C.