Kiribati vs Nauru: Global warming fossil

Kiribati
0
in 2024
Nauru
0
in 2024
Kiribati rank
203rd
Nauru rank
202nd

Global warming fossil over time

  • Kiribati
  • Nauru
000000185119372024

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 0 against 0 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 174 shared years of data; in 1851 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 203rd and Nauru ranks 202nd of 214 countries.

Across the 18 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 12 and Nauru in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Nauru Difference Ahead
1850s 0 0 0 Kiribati
1860s 0 0 0 Kiribati
1870s 0 0 0 Kiribati
1880s 0 0 0 Kiribati
1890s 0 0 0 Kiribati
1900s 0 0 0 Kiribati
1910s 0 0 0 Kiribati
1920s 0 0 0 Kiribati
1930s 0 0 0 Kiribati
1940s 0 0 0 Kiribati
1950s 0 0 0 Kiribati
1960s 0 0 0 Kiribati
1970s 0 0 0 Nauru
1980s 0 0 0 Nauru
1990s 0 0 0 Nauru
2000s 0 0 0 Nauru
2010s 0 0 0 Nauru
2020s 0 0 0 Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher global warming fossil, Kiribati or Nauru?
Nauru, at 0 against 0 in Kiribati as of 2024.
What is the difference in global warming fossil between Kiribati and Nauru?
0, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Nauru?
174 years are reported by both, from 1851 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Nauru rank globally for global warming fossil?
Kiribati ranks 203rd and Nauru ranks 202nd of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Global warming fossil. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Global warming fossil
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
214 places, 37,236 data points, 1851–2024
Last refreshed