Estonia vs South Africa: Greenhouse Gas Footprints (GHGFP) 2025 edition: Principal indicators
Greenhouse Gas Footprints (GHGFP) 2025 edition: Principal indicators over time
- Estonia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.405 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar against 0.249 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar in Estonia, a difference of 0.156 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.6 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 28 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 3rd and South Africa ranks 4th of 12 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.66 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | 0.9824 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | 0.6726 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | Estonia |
| 2000s | 0.9451 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | 0.7871 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | 0.158 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0.4453 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | 0.5769 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | 0.1316 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0.2527 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | 0.4533 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | 0.2007 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher greenhouse gas footprints (ghgfp) 2025 edition: principal indicators, Estonia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 0.405 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar against 0.249 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar in Estonia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in greenhouse gas footprints (ghgfp) 2025 edition: principal indicators between Estonia and South Africa?
- 0.156 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and South Africa?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2022.
- How do Estonia and South Africa rank globally for greenhouse gas footprints (ghgfp) 2025 edition: principal indicators?
- Estonia ranks 3rd and South Africa ranks 4th of 12 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Greenhouse Gas Footprints (GHGFP) 2025 edition: Principal indicators — Demand-based emissions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Greenhouse Gas emissions Footprints Indicators are calculated by combining the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) Tables and other Greenhouse Gas Emissions databases, such as Air Emissions Accounts. Production-based emissions are estimated according to the residence principle. They refer to the GHG emitted from the resident economic activities and households of a country. Demand-based emissions encompass GHG emissions from the resident households of a country, as well as direct and indirect upstream emissions from its final expenditure of final goods and services. • Methodology: Measuring Greenhouse Gas Footprints in Global Production Networks • Note: Additional information on GHG FP indicators 2025 edition • Contact: icio-tiva.contact@oecd.org. Related datasets •GHG 2025 edition Access to other editions • GHGFP editions