China vs Estonia: Greenhouse Gas Footprints (GHGFP) 2025 edition: Principal indicators
Greenhouse Gas Footprints (GHGFP) 2025 edition: Principal indicators over time
- China
- Estonia
How they compare
China currently reports 0.438 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar against 0.231 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar in Estonia, a difference of 0.207 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar.
That makes China's figure about 1.9 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 28 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Estonia ahead.
China ranks 5th and Estonia ranks 4th of 66 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.59 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | 1.99 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | 0.3968 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | Estonia |
| 2000s | 1.1 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | 0.9682 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | 0.1287 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | China |
| 2010s | 0.6734 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | 0.5538 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | 0.1196 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | China |
| 2020s | 0.4853 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | 0.2297 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | 0.2557 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher greenhouse gas footprints (ghgfp) 2025 edition: principal indicators, China or Estonia?
- China, at 0.438 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar against 0.231 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar in Estonia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in greenhouse gas footprints (ghgfp) 2025 edition: principal indicators between China and Estonia?
- 0.207 Kilogrammes of CO2-equivalent per US dollar, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Estonia?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2022.
- How do China and Estonia rank globally for greenhouse gas footprints (ghgfp) 2025 edition: principal indicators?
- China ranks 5th and Estonia ranks 4th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Greenhouse Gas Footprints (GHGFP) 2025 edition: Principal indicators — Production-based emissions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Greenhouse Gas emissions Footprints Indicators are calculated by combining the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) Tables and other Greenhouse Gas Emissions databases, such as Air Emissions Accounts. Production-based emissions are estimated according to the residence principle. They refer to the GHG emitted from the resident economic activities and households of a country. Demand-based emissions encompass GHG emissions from the resident households of a country, as well as direct and indirect upstream emissions from its final expenditure of final goods and services. • Methodology: Measuring Greenhouse Gas Footprints in Global Production Networks • Note: Additional information on GHG FP indicators 2025 edition • Contact: icio-tiva.contact@oecd.org. Related datasets •GHG 2025 edition Access to other editions • GHGFP editions