Belarus vs Tonga: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Belarus
0.1161 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Tonga
0.1165 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
29th
Tonga rank
28th

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Tonga
0.0250.050.0750.10.1250.15196119922023

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 0.1165 kt per square kilometre against 0.1161 kt per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0004 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 29th and Tonga ranks 28th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Tonga in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Tonga Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1294 kt per square kilometre 0.107 kt per square kilometre 0.0224 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.1142 kt per square kilometre 0.1098 kt per square kilometre 0.0045 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0.1182 kt per square kilometre 0.1134 kt per square kilometre 0.0048 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.116 kt per square kilometre 0.1163 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Belarus or Tonga?
Tonga, at 0.1165 kt per square kilometre against 0.1161 kt per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Belarus and Tonga?
0.0004 kt per square kilometre, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Tonga?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Tonga rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 29th and Tonga ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Tonga: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/tonga/">Belarus vs Tonga: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 11,244 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.