Dominica vs Trinidad and Tobago: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Dominica
0.0507 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0525 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominica rank
93rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
92nd

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Dominica
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.0525 kt per square kilometre against 0.0507 kt per square kilometre in Dominica, a difference of 0.0018 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Dominica ranks 93rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 92nd of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0173 kt per square kilometre 0.0382 kt per square kilometre 0.0209 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.0239 kt per square kilometre 0.0514 kt per square kilometre 0.0275 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.044 kt per square kilometre 0.0467 kt per square kilometre 0.0028 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.0597 kt per square kilometre 0.0423 kt per square kilometre 0.0174 kt per square kilometre Dominica
2000s 0.0517 kt per square kilometre 0.0479 kt per square kilometre 0.0038 kt per square kilometre Dominica
2010s 0.0514 kt per square kilometre 0.0528 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.051 kt per square kilometre 0.052 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Dominica or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.0525 kt per square kilometre against 0.0507 kt per square kilometre in Dominica as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Dominica and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0018 kt per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Dominica and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Dominica ranks 93rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Trinidad and Tobago: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/dominica/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/dominica/trinidad-and-tobago/">Dominica vs Trinidad and Tobago: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 11,244 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.