Bangladesh vs Sudan: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions over time
- Bangladesh
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 92.82 kt against 82.83 kt in Bangladesh, a difference of 9.99 kt.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 24th and Sudan ranks 23rd of 248 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 73.44 kt | 91.77 kt | 18.33 kt | Sudan |
| 2020s | 81.54 kt | 93.37 kt | 11.83 kt | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions, Bangladesh or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 92.82 kt against 82.83 kt in Bangladesh as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions between Bangladesh and Sudan?
- 9.99 kt, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Sudan rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions?
- Bangladesh ranks 24th and Sudan ranks 23rd of 248 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf