Belarus vs Mali: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions over time
- Belarus
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 51.92 kt against 51.13 kt in Belarus, a difference of 0.79 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 39th and Mali ranks 38th of 248 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.88 kt | 22.38 kt | 26.5 kt | Belarus |
| 2000s | 49.22 kt | 29.26 kt | 19.96 kt | Belarus |
| 2010s | 51.33 kt | 39.89 kt | 11.44 kt | Belarus |
| 2020s | 50.62 kt | 49.84 kt | 0.7705 kt | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions, Belarus or Mali?
- Mali, at 51.92 kt against 51.13 kt in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions between Belarus and Mali?
- 0.79 kt, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Mali?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Mali rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 39th and Mali ranks 38th of 248 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf