Cuba vs Tajikistan: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions over time
- Cuba
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 8.52 kt against 8.28 kt in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.24 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 114th and Tajikistan ranks 115th of 248 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.5 kt | 3.78 kt | 8.72 kt | Cuba |
| 2000s | 10.28 kt | 3.63 kt | 6.65 kt | Cuba |
| 2010s | 10.77 kt | 5.93 kt | 4.84 kt | Cuba |
| 2020s | 9 kt | 8.03 kt | 0.9674 kt | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions, Cuba or Tajikistan?
- Cuba, at 8.52 kt against 8.28 kt in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions between Cuba and Tajikistan?
- 0.24 kt, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Tajikistan rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions?
- Cuba ranks 114th and Tajikistan ranks 115th of 248 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf