Czechia vs Serbia: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions over time
- Czechia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 10.24 kt against 10.04 kt in Czechia, a difference of 0.2 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Czechia ranks 109th and Serbia ranks 108th of 248 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.2 kt | 12.03 kt | 1.84 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 12.12 kt | 10.55 kt | 1.57 kt | Czechia |
| 2020s | 11.12 kt | 10.07 kt | 1.06 kt | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions, Czechia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 10.24 kt against 10.04 kt in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions between Czechia and Serbia?
- 0.2 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Serbia rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions?
- Czechia ranks 109th and Serbia ranks 108th of 248 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf