Georgia vs Latvia: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions Share (CO2eq)
Georgia
17.68 %
in 2023
Latvia
16.84 %
in 2023
Georgia rank
75th
Latvia rank
77th
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions Share (CO2eq) over time
- Georgia
- Latvia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 17.68 % against 16.84 % in Latvia, a difference of 0.84 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Georgia ranks 75th and Latvia ranks 77th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 34.06 % | 129.61 % | 95.55 % | Latvia |
| 2000s | 48.64 % | -5.51 % | 54.15 % | Georgia |
| 2010s | 20.49 % | 43.67 % | 23.17 % | Latvia |
| 2020s | 17.61 % | 20.83 % | 3.22 % | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions share (co2eq), Georgia or Latvia?
- Georgia, at 17.68 % against 16.84 % in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions share (co2eq) between Georgia and Latvia?
- 0.84 %, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Latvia rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions share (co2eq)?
- Georgia ranks 75th and Latvia ranks 77th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions Share (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.