Australia vs Latvia: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Australia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
145th
Latvia rank
146th

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Latvia
000000196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Australia ranks 145th and Latvia ranks 146th of 182 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Australia or Latvia?
Australia, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Australia and Latvia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Latvia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Australia and Latvia rank globally for ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 145th and Latvia ranks 146th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Latvia: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/australia/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/australia/latvia/">Australia vs Latvia: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 10,509 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.