Cuba vs El Salvador: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Cuba
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
41st
El Salvador rank
39th

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • El Salvador
000000196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

Cuba ranks 41st and El Salvador ranks 39th of 182 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Cuba or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Cuba and El Salvador?
0 kt per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and El Salvador rank globally for ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 41st and El Salvador ranks 39th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs El Salvador: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/cuba/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/cuba/el-salvador/">Cuba vs El Salvador: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 10,509 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.