Cuba vs Guatemala: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Cuba
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
41st
Guatemala rank
42nd

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Guatemala
0000196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 41st and Guatemala ranks 42nd of 182 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Cuba or Guatemala?
Cuba, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Cuba and Guatemala?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Guatemala rank globally for ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 41st and Guatemala ranks 42nd of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Guatemala: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/cuba/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/cuba/guatemala/">Cuba vs Guatemala: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 10,509 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.