Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Ecuador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
108th
Zimbabwe rank
106th

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Zimbabwe
000000196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Ecuador ranks 108th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 182 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 108th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/zimbabwe/">Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 10,509 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.