Guatemala vs Tonga: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Guatemala
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Tonga
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
42nd
Tonga rank
40th

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Tonga
00000196119922023

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 42nd and Tonga ranks 40th of 182 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Tonga Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Tonga
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Tonga
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Tonga
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Tonga
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Tonga
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Tonga?
Tonga, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Tonga?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Tonga?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Tonga rank globally for ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 42nd and Tonga ranks 40th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Tonga: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/tonga/">Guatemala vs Tonga: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 10,509 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.