Mauritania vs Zambia: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Mauritania
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
149th
Zambia rank
148th

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • Zambia
00000196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 149th and Zambia ranks 148th of 182 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritania
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritania
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritania
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritania
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritania
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Mauritania or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Mauritania and Zambia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Zambia rank globally for ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 149th and Zambia ranks 148th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Zambia: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/zambia/">Mauritania vs Zambia: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 10,509 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.