Nauru vs Zambia: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Nauru
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Nauru rank
150th
Zambia rank
148th

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Nauru
  • Zambia
0000196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Nauru, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Nauru's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Nauru ranks 150th and Zambia ranks 148th of 182 countries.

Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Nauru
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Nauru
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Nauru
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Nauru
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Nauru
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Nauru
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Nauru or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Nauru as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Nauru and Zambia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nauru and Zambia rank globally for ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Nauru ranks 150th and Zambia ranks 148th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Zambia: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/naoero/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/naoero/zambia/">Nauru vs Zambia: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 10,509 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.