Panama vs East Timor: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Panama
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
99th
East Timor rank
97th

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Panama
  • East Timor
00000196119922023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was East Timor ahead.

Panama ranks 99th and East Timor ranks 97th of 182 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 5 and East Timor in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama East Timor Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre East Timor
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Panama
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Panama
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Panama
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Panama
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Panama
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Panama or East Timor?
East Timor, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Panama and East Timor?
0 kt per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and East Timor?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and East Timor rank globally for ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Panama ranks 99th and East Timor ranks 97th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs East Timor: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/panama/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/panama/timor-leste/">Panama vs East Timor: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 10,509 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.