Czechia vs Serbia and Montenegro: IPPU — Emissions
IPPU — Emissions over time
- Czechia
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 2,670 kt against 2,574 kt in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 96 kt.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 81st and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 84th of 232 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,291 kt | 1,746 kt | 2,545 kt | Czechia |
| 2000s | 3,803 kt | 2,193 kt | 1,610 kt | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions, Czechia or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Czechia, at 2,670 kt against 2,574 kt in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions between Czechia and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 96 kt, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
- How do Czechia and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for ippu — emissions?
- Czechia ranks 81st and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 84th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf