East Timor vs Turks and Caicos Islands: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

East Timor
0.0002 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0003 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor rank
180th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
177th

IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • East Timor
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00000196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.0003 kt per square kilometre against 0.0002 kt per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.5 times East Timor's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was East Timor ahead.

East Timor ranks 180th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 177th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, East Timor averaged higher in 6 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Timor Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre East Timor
1970s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre East Timor
1980s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre East Timor
1990s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre East Timor
2000s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ippu — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, East Timor or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.0003 kt per square kilometre against 0.0002 kt per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in ippu — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between East Timor and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do East Timor and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for ippu — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
East Timor ranks 180th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 177th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Timor vs Turks and Caicos Islands: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/turks-and-caicos-islands/">East Timor vs Turks and Caicos Islands: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 10,734 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.