Belgium vs Ghana: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases
IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases over time
- Belgium
- Ghana
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 2,150 kt against 2,120 kt in Belgium, a difference of 30 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 54th and Ghana ranks 52nd of 163 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,097 kt | 601.6 kt | 1,495 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 3,052 kt | 1,028 kt | 2,024 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 2,385 kt | 1,922 kt | 462.5 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions (co2eq) from f-gases, Belgium or Ghana?
- Ghana, at 2,150 kt against 2,120 kt in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions (co2eq) from f-gases between Belgium and Ghana?
- 30 kt, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Ghana?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Ghana rank globally for ippu — emissions (co2eq) from f-gases?
- Belgium ranks 54th and Ghana ranks 52nd of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf