Congo vs South Sudan: IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases
IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases over time
- Congo
- South Sudan
How they compare
Congo currently reports 379 kt against 367 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 12 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Congo ranks 118th and South Sudan ranks 119th of 163 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 192.5 kt | 204.5 kt | 12 kt | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 339 kt | 325.5 kt | 13.5 kt | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions (co2eq) from f-gases, Congo or South Sudan?
- Congo, at 379 kt against 367 kt in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions (co2eq) from f-gases between Congo and South Sudan?
- 12 kt, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Congo and South Sudan rank globally for ippu — emissions (co2eq) from f-gases?
- Congo ranks 118th and South Sudan ranks 119th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf