Which has higher ippu — emissions, Ecuador or Namibia?

Namibia, at 0.0577 kt against 0.0541 kt in Ecuador as of 2023.

How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Namibia: IPPU — Emissions

Ecuador

0.0541 kt

in 2023

Namibia

0.0577 kt

in 2023

Ecuador rank

102nd

Namibia rank

101st

IPPU — Emissions over time

Ecuador
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0577 kt against 0.0541 kt in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0036 kt.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 102nd and Namibia ranks 101st of 229 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0137 kt	0.0122 kt	0.0014 kt	Ecuador
1970s	0.0207 kt	0.0179 kt	0.0028 kt	Ecuador
1980s	0.0269 kt	0.0233 kt	0.0036 kt	Ecuador
1990s	0.034 kt	0.033 kt	0.001 kt	Ecuador
2000s	0.0409 kt	0.0407 kt	0.0002 kt	Ecuador
2010s	0.0481 kt	0.0484 kt	0.0003 kt	Namibia
2020s	0.053 kt	0.056 kt	0.003 kt	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ippu — emissions, Ecuador or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0.0577 kt against 0.0541 kt in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in ippu — emissions between Ecuador and Namibia?: 0.0036 kt, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for ippu — emissions?: Ecuador ranks 102nd and Namibia ranks 101st of 229 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Namibia: IPPU — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/ecuador/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/ecuador/namibia/">Ecuador vs Namibia: IPPU — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: IPPU — Emissions (N2O)
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 262 places, 15,109 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 17 September 2026

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf